Bush: Kids' Health Care Will Get Vetoed
By JENNIFER LOVEN
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush again called Democrats "irresponsible" on Saturday for pushing an expansion he opposes to a children's health insurance program.
"Democrats in Congress have decided to pass a bill they know will be vetoed," Bush said of the measure that draws significant bipartisan support, repeating in his weekly radio address an accusation he made earlier in the week. "Members of Congress are risking health coverage for poor children purely to make a political point."
Nothing is more annoying than a politician twisting in his own skin. I do not understand where Bush gets off thinking Poor Children don't deserve health care, and on top of it he tries to twist HIS veto around to be an error of the democratic party...
what ever happened to
"I'm a Uniter, Not a divider."
George W. Bush 05/06/99
Following a basic logic one would assume that this is a divisive act by the most extreme of definitions.
In the Democrat's response, also broadcast Saturday, Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell turned the tables on the president, saying that if Bush doesn't sign the bill, 15 states will have no funding left for the program by the end of the month.
At issue is the Children's Health Insurance Program, a state-federal program that subsidizes health coverage for low-income people, mostly children, in families that earn too much to qualify for Medicaid, but not enough to afford private coverage. It expires Sept. 30.
Now see... This is where I put on my ass kicking boots. This is where most people in my shoes would do the same. My son is currently insured thanks to one of these federally funded state insurance programs. So let me say it plain and simple Georgy boy... Unless you pull Jenna And Barbara's cover everything insurance; Don't think about touching my Kids health care. I will insight political riots if you do...
plain and simple.
Your party has refused the people of this country basic health care for too long now. If you pull the little bit you already provide, whats to say you don't begin a revolution? Oh damn... you could even lose your party as you know it if the Ron Paul Revolution occurs (yeah... right... =( ) Hunger caused the French Revolution... Couldn't illness cause the 2nd US revolution?
No comments:
Post a Comment